Brad N. Garcia
Partner
Disclaimer
Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.
Brad Garcia focuses his practice on appellate and complex litigation matters. He has drafted numerous briefs in the US Supreme Court and state and federal appellate and trial courts. Brad has presented argument in more than a dozen appeals in federal and state appellate courts, including in the US Supreme Court, the First, Third, Fourth, Ninth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuits, and the California Court of Appeals and Maryland Court of Appeals. Brad has also argued multiple dispositive motions in trial court. He represents clients in a wide variety of matters, with a particular focus in patent and insurance law, but with experience spanning criminal law, class actions, ERISA, federal jurisdiction, product defect and liability, and other complex litigation matters.
Brad maintains an active pro bono practice, focusing on constitutional law as well as criminal and immigration-related matters. He also serves as a member of the Supreme Court and Appellate Advisory Board for the MacArthur Justice Center. He is the recipient of O’Melveny’s Warren Christopher Values Award, an honor bestowed on those who exemplify the Firm’s legacy of excellence, leadership, and citizenship.
Prior to joining O’Melveny, Brad was a law clerk for Associate Justice Elena Kagan on the US Supreme Court, and the Honorable Thomas B. Griffith on the US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit.
Honors & Awards
- Selected as one of The National Law Journal’s 2021 “DC Rising Stars”
- Named an Appellate Fresh Face by Bloomberg Law (2021)
- US Supreme Court victory for China Agritech named a National Impact Case by Benchmark Litigation California (2019)
Admissions
Bar Admissions
- District of Columbia
- Maryland
Court Admissions
- US District Court, District Of Columbia
- US Court of Appeals, First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuits
- US Supreme Court
Education
- Harvard University, J.D.: magna cum laude; Editor, Harvard Law Review
- Johns Hopkins University, B.A., International Studies and Economics
Professional Activities
Clerkships
- Honorable Elena Kagan, US Supreme Court
- Honorable Thomas B. Griffith, US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit
Board Member
- MacArthur Justice Center Supreme Court & Appellate Advisory Board
Representative US Supreme Court Matters
- United States v. Palomar-Santiago — Briefed and argued case on behalf of former lawful permanent resident concerning the scope of criminal liability under 18 U.S.C. § 1326.
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York — Contributed to merits brief and related filings on behalf of City of New York in significant Second Amendment case.
- United States v. Sims — Co-authored merits brief in a criminal case concerning the scope of the Armed Career Criminal Act.
- China Agritech v. Resh — Drafted merits briefs in the Supreme Court in important dispute concerning the scope of class action tolling under American Pipe.
- Pereira v. Sessions — Authored amicus brief on behalf of the American Immigration Lawyers Association in case regarding the necessary contents of a “notice to appear” to trigger the stop-time rule for purposes of immigration proceedings.
- Evenwel v. Abbott — Co-authored amicus brief on behalf of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund arguing that the one person, one vote doctrine requires counting total population when drawing electoral districts instead of only eligible voters.
- Rucho v. Common Cause and Whitford v. Gill — Co-authored amicus briefs for the Brennan Center arguing that federal courts should adjudicate partisan gerrymandering challenges in two landmark Supreme Court cases.
- June Medical Services LLC v. Russo — With co-counsel, the Center for Reproductive Rights, helped brief this reproductive-rights case and secured a 5-4 victory.
Representative State and Federal Appellate Court Matters
- Wong v. FMR LLC — Brief and argued in the First Circuit in successful defense of district court’s dismissal of complaint challenging client’s “infrastructure fees” under ERISA.
- ACE American Insurance Company v. Exide Technologies, Inc. — Briefed and argued Eleventh Circuit appeal, persuading the court to reverse a judgment based on the interpretation of a contract provision that had not been construed by any other court.
- Keller v. Federal Insurance Company — Successfully briefed and argued matter in the Ninth Circuit concerning the enforcement of a contractual limitations period in insurance dispute.
- Lester v. United States — Successfully briefed and argued Fourth Circuit case arguing that client should not have been deemed a career offender under the mandatory sentencing guidelines, ultimately leading to client’s release from prison.
- United States v. Swaby — Successfully briefed and argued Fourth Circuit appeal, leading to reversal of district court’s denial of motion to vacate on the basis that client’s attorney had not informed him of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea, ultimately leading to client’s ability to return to the United States with lawful status.
- State v. Jackson — Co-authored briefs and presented argument in a complex criminal appeal in the Maryland Court of Appeals.
- Gamez v. ACE U.S.A. — Successfully briefed and argued a case in the Eleventh Circuit addressing the application of a Florida statute to misrepresentations in insurance applications.
- S.D. v. K.W. — Authored briefs and successfully argued matter in the California Court of Appeals in successful effort to reverse a district court’s dismissal of a suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Central National Insurance et al. — Co-authored briefs persuading Wisconsin Court of Appeals to overturn $70 million judgment in insurance dispute.
- Kelley v. Fidelity Management Trust Co. — Co-authored brief in the First Circuit successfully defending client’s “float” practices in high-stakes ERISA appeal.
- Ellis v. Fidelity Management Trust Co. — Co-authored brief in the First Circuit successfully defending district court’s grant of summary judgment in ERISA matter.
- Narragansett Electric Company v. Century Indemnity Company — Authored briefs successfully persuading Second Circuit to vacate a nearly $10 million judgment on the basis that district court had misinterpreted the insurance contract at issue.
- Nease v. Ford Motor Company — Authored briefs in successful Fourth Circuit appeal that resulted in an important, precedential opinion concerning district court’s gatekeeping obligations with respect to expert evidence.
Representative Federal Circuit Matters
- AGIS v. Google LLC — Briefed and argued two related Federal Circuit appeals, successfully defending favorable PTAB rulings invalidating a range of patent claims.
- Location Based Services v. Niantic — Co-authored appellate brief successfully defending district court’s invalidation of patent claims on Section 101 grounds.
- Florida Atlantic University Research Corp. v. Top Victory Electronics — Authored merits brief in successful defense of jury verdict of non-infringement.
- Hitachi v. Top Victory Electronics — Authored merits brief in successful defense of jury verdict finding asserted patents either invalid or not infringed.
- Mentor Graphics v. Eve — Assisted in argument preparation as well as en banc and certiorari strategy in case regarding apportionment of damages for lost profits and the application of assignor estoppel doctrine.
- In re Samsung Electronics — Led briefing that secured grant of writ of mandamus in published opinion constraining efforts by patent plaintiffs to manipulate transfer of venue analysis.