alerts & publications
Court Places Aerospace Manufacturing/Rework Facility Air Pollution Control Technology (MACT) Challenge On HoldMarch 8, 2016
On March 3, 2016, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit placed on hold a lawsuit challenging revised toxic air pollutant emissions limits for the aerospace industry. A joint motion filed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Aerospace MACT Group, an industry trade group, requested that the litigation be held in abeyance to provide additional time for the EPA to review an earlier-filed administrative petition demanding reconsideration of the EPA’s aerospace rulemaking.
The administrative petition, filed by the Aerospace Industries Association, challenges the EPA’s 2015 maximum achievable control technology (“MACT”) standards for aerospace manufacturing and rework facilities. As part of the revised standards, the EPA established the first-ever emissions limits for organic and inorganic emissions of hazardous air pollutants from specialty coating application operations; removed exemptions for periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction (“SSM”) so that affected units will be subject to the emission standards at all times; and revised provisions to address recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to periods of SSM. The amendments include a requirement to report performance testing through the EPA’s Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (“CEDRI”).
The EPA projects that the new emissions limits will reduce emissions of toluene, glycol ethers, and other pollutants by 58 tons per year, and would cost the average facility less than $10,000 per year to comply. In granting the stay, the D.C. Circuit ordered the parties to submit status reports on the reconsideration petition every 60 days beginning June 1.
We will keep you apprised of further developments
This memorandum is a summary for general information and discussion only and may be considered an advertisement for certain purposes. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented, may not be relied upon as legal advice, and does not purport to represent the views of our clients or the Firm. Eric Rothenberg, an O'Melveny partner licensed to practice law in Missouri and New York, and Bob Nicksin, an O'Melveny counsel licensed to practice law in California, contributed to the content of this newsletter. The views expressed in this newsletter are the views of the authors except as otherwise noted.
Portions of this communication may contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Please direct all inquiries regarding New York's Rules of Professional Conduct to O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Times Square Tower, 7 Times Square, New York, NY, 10036, Phone:+1-212-326-2000. © 2016 O'Melveny & Myers LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.