alerts & publications
Abe’s Reform of Japan’s White Collar Employment System?May 30, 2014
On May 28, Japan’s Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labor of Japan (the “Ministry”) formally proposed to the Abe administration that a white collar exemption be introduced for “global class professionals.” Under current law, an employer must pay overtime to all employees except those in managerial positions. “Managerial” has been very narrowly interpreted by the Ministry and judicial precedents to include only employees whose sole responsibility is to supervise subordinates. Under the proposal, companies would be exempt from paying overtime to certain professional employees. Albeit a small change, this is a potential first step to reform the entire employment system.
Japan is known for its “lifetime employment system,” but in reality this is a recent phenomenon which began in the second half of the 20th century. Given the explosive economic growth in the 1950s and 1960s, companies were desperate to secure a stable and loyal workforce, which led them to introduce systems to encourage employees to stay longer. Following this movement, statutes and judicial precedents increased the levels of protection for “regular” employees, who were expected to work for the same employer for their whole career. Terminating regular employees was made extremely difficult, and overtime pay was secured for all employees.
However, as the economy slowed in 1990s, the lifetime employment system started to falter. While the supply of available jobs was limited, employment laws and judicial precedents prevented companies from replacing older, highly paid, and low performing workers with fresh ones. The younger generation suffered. The percentage of population employed on a non-regular or part-time basis rose to 35.2% in 2012, up from 20.2% in 1990. The statistic for younger workers (15 to 24) has risen to 32.3% in 2013, up from 11.5% in 1993, while that for older male workers (45 to 54) remained lower than 10%. The average income of non-regular/part-time employees was only 36% of regular (or life-time) employees in 2013.
The Japanese government has struggled to reform the current regime, despite international and domestic pressure to do so. Internationally, in 2006 the OECD warned that Japan needed to reduce employment protection for workers. Domestically, the Koizumi administration tried in 2001 to amend the Labor Standard Law to make termination easier, but failed. In 2007, the former Abe administration proposed a system to make it possible to terminate by paying the equivalent of two years’ salary, but failed. In July 2012, the Noda administration proposed to set the retirement age at 40, which meant that employment should be secured until age 40, but with employers free to keep only capable employees older than 40 and terminate others. The proposal was not accepted. The current Abe administration, again, is trying to reform the Japanese labor markets.
Introduction of the white collar exemption is a small but important step to liberalize, rationalize, and modernize the Japanese employment system, to thereby vitalize the labor market and stimulate domestic consumption. The Ministry has historically been resistive, claiming that it is responsible to protect workers. The Ministry’s proposal on May 28, 2014 amends its stance. Businesses are advocating expansion of the scope of the white collar exemption. Labor unions remain strongly against this reform. How this proceeds will be at least a partial test of the “Abenomics” program. O’Melveny will continue to monitor developments and provide further updates for future developments.
 Click here
 Click here
 Click here
 Click here
This memorandum is a summary for general information and discussion only and may be considered an advertisement for certain purposes. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented, may not be relied upon as legal advice, and does not purport to represent the views of our clients or the Firm. Yoji Maeda, an O'Melveny partner licensed to practice law in Japan and New York, contributed to the content of this newsletter. The views expressed in this newsletter are the views of the authors except as otherwise noted.
Portions of this communication may contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Please direct all inquiries regarding our conduct under New York's Code of Professional Responsibility to O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Times Square Tower, 7 Times Square, New York, NY, 10036, Phone:+1-212-326-2000.
© 2014 O'Melveny & Myers LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.