alerts & publications
Litigate the Torts, Not the Mass: A Modest Proposal for Reforming How Mass Torts are AdjudicatedJanuary 1, 0001
Mass torts present a challenge to the US court system because there is no standardized approach for dealing with the overwhelming number of cases that arise when products are recalled or a financial scandal is uncovered. Typically, a federal court is assigned by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to coordinate the onslaught of litigation, but without any guidelines for managing the caseload, that court is forced to find some way of efficiently resolving the litigation. Plaintiffs' counsel often pressure the court to deal with the mountain of cases by cutting due process corners or applying pressure for an early global settlement.
Citing specific examples from the product liability and pharmaceutical industry litigation, the monograph explores the current treatment of mass torts and proposes four simple procedural reforms that could improve the way mass torts are handled by US courts. Beisner and Miller suggest:
Expanding the diversity jurisdiction of federal courts to enable further concentration of claims before a minimal number of tribunals;
Adopting standardized winnowing procedures to arrive more quickly at an understanding of the size and nature of the legitimate claims pool;
Eliminating class action tolling of limitations periods to provide clearer guidance to the parties about when all viable claims must be filed; and
Revising ethical rules to account for the unique problems posed by mass tort settlements.
The monograph features a foreword by Richard A. Nagareda, Professor of Law & Director of the Cecil D. Bransetter Litigation & Dispute Resolution Program at Vanderbilt University Law School.
Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.