alerts & publications
No Harm, No Foul: Jury Rejects Reinsurer’s Late-Notice DefenseAugust 23, 2018
In this bylined article in ARIAS US Quarterly by partner Tancred Schiavoni and counsel Vincent Weisband, the authors discuss a recent case, Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., where defendants’ late-notice defense was rejected by a jury.
“Rarely, if ever, does a reinsurer’s late notice defense reach a jury; when one does, the lessons that flow from trial can be valuable. This is especially so when the jury rejects that defense—leaving the reinsurer on the hook for tens of millions of dollars—and a federal judge then denies the reinsurer’s motion for a new trial. A New York federal court’s recent decision offers an unusual, up-close glimpse of the bar that a late-notice defense may have to clear in a jury trial.”
Click here to read the full article.
Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.