alerts & publications
The Difficulties of Showing Pass Through in Indirect Purchaser Component Cases12월 11, 2018
Partner Bo Pearl and associate Allison Smith authored this article, which appears in the December edition of Competition, published by the California Antitrust, Unfair Competition, and Privacy Law section of the California Lawyers Association.
The authors provide a recent case study, the lithium ion battery litigation, as an example of the difficulty of showing pass through on a case-wide basis.
“Pass through continues to be a hurdle to showing antitrust injury for a class of indirect purchasers of an allegedly price-fixed component, although the record in electronic component cases is somewhat mixed,” the authors write. “While not dispositive, certain market characteristics impede indirect purchasers’ ability to show pass through of an overcharge on a class wide basis, particularly heterogeneity of the component or finished product and pricing strategies and pressures that influence intermediaries’ pricing decisions.”
To read the full article, click here.
Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.