alerts & publications
Update: D.C. Circuit Issues Order Requiring EPA to Issue SuperfundFinancial Assurance RegulationsMay 21, 2015
On May 19th 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (“D.C. Circuit”) issued an order directing the issuance of financial assurance regulations under the Federal Superfund program. As discussed in our previous Client Alert (see OMM April 20, 2015, Client Alert, EPA Issues Financial Assurance Guidance for Superfund Settlement Agreements and Unilateral Administrative Orders), on August 8, 2014, several environmental groups filed a writ of mandamus asking that the D.C. Circuit require the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to issue financial assurance rules pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) for certain industries, including the chemical manufacturing, hardrock mining, petroleum and coal tar manufacturing, and electricity generation/transmission sectors. In re: Idaho Conservation League, et al, Case No. 14-1149 (D.C. Cir.). The subject financial assurance rules will obligate companies performing CERCLA remedies to provide a standby financing mechanism (guarantee, bond, insurance or letter of credit) against the EPA-project remedy cost.
During oral arguments held on May 12, 2015, the petitioners acknowledged that, due to the passage of time, the January 2016 deadline requested in their petition for action on the financial assurance regulations was no longer feasible. The EPA reported that it had provided the April 2015 guidance covered in the above-noted Alert (directing regional offices to include financial assurance obligations in settlement agreements and consent judgments), and that it had recently completed the “framework” for a proposed rule for hardrock mining.
In light of these developments, the D.C. Circuit order directs the petitioners to update the time frame they seek for the EPA to issue financial assurance regulations, and asks EPA to update its rulemaking schedule to expedite “to the greatest possible extent” the issuance of financial assurance rules in accordance with the proposed schedule. The D.C. Circuit specifically ordered the parties to identify the dates by which the EPA will issue proposed and final financial assurance rules for the hardrock mining industry. In addition, the Court ordered the parties to specify the deadlines for the EPA to determine whether to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking for the chemical manufacturing, petroleum and coal products manufacturing, and electricity generation/transmission industries, and, if the EPA decides to proceed, the timeline for issuing proposed and final financial assurance rules for those industries.
The D.C. Circuit also authorized the petitioners to supplement their declarations to support their claim for Article III standing, an issue on which the Court has not yet ruled.
The parties’ submissions are due on June 9, 2015, with any responses due June 15, 2015.
This memorandum is a summary for general information and discussion only and may be considered an advertisement for certain purposes. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented, may not be relied upon as legal advice, and does not purport to represent the views of our clients or the Firm. Eric Rothenberg, an O'Melveny partner licensed to practice law in Missouri and New York, Kelly McTigue, an O'Melveny partner licensed to practice law in California, John Renneisen, an O'Melveny counsel licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia, and Jesse Glickstein, an O'Melveny associate licensed to practice law in New Jersey and New York, contributed to the content of this newsletter. The views expressed in this newsletter are the views of the authors except as otherwise noted.
Portions of this communication may contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Please direct all inquiries regarding New York's Rules of Professional Conduct to O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Times Square Tower, 7 Times Square, New York, NY, 10036, Phone:+1-212-326-2000. © 2015 O'Melveny & Myers LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.