Matthew Kaiser


Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.

Matthew Kaiser is an experienced litigator who represents clients in a wide range of complex business litigation, including consumer class actions, mass torts, unfair competition, and related commercial litigation. He has represented pharmaceutical companies, videogame publishers, mass media conglomerates, and an aerospace manufacturer. These clients have worked with Matthew in a range of matters including products liability, false advertising, invasion of privacy, and breach of fiduciary duty. Matthew has secured dismissal of multiple complaints in state and federal court and has helped negotiate favorable settlements for a number of clients. He has also worked on multiple trial and arbitration teams.


Bar Admissions

  • California

Court Admissions

  • U.S. District Court, Central and Northern Districts of California


  • Loyola Law School, J.D., summa cum laude; Sayre Macneil Scholar; articles editor, Loyola Law Review; Order of the Coif
  • DePaul University, B.A., Philosophy; cum laude; Dean's List

Professional Activities


  • Honorable Margaret M. Morrow, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California


  • “The Federal Circuit's Unbounded Conception of Inherency in Patent Law,” 47 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 345 (2013)