alerts & publications
China Broadens Environmental Enforcement Plant Closures4月 3, 2018
Consistent with President Xi Jinping’s “Blue Skies” initiative, first announced when he came to power in 2013, the last year has seen a dramatic increase in pollution enforcement and related facility closures.
Beginning in the spring of 2017, the national environmental agency deployed a force of 5,000 inspectors on a yearlong program to complete visits to manufacturing facilities primarily in coastal cities and provinces, resulting in fines, penalties, imprisonment and, in many circumstances, facility closures pending installation of pollution controls, submission of corrected permit applications and payment of sanctions. During a seventh round of inspections conducted in July 2017, for example, 30% of 5,322 manufacturing sites were found to be in significant non-compliance.
In a related development, in August 2017, the China State Council (equivalent to the US Cabinet) issued guidelines for the closure and/or relocation of hazardous chemical manufacturing facilities in densely populated areas. The move came, in part, as a response to highly publicized accidents, such as the August 2015 explosions at a container storage station in the Port of Tianjin that killed 173 and injured hundreds of others in the industrial zone outside of Beijing. The guidelines, together with the Blue Skies enforcement program, have thus far resulted in the closure of an estimated 150,000 facilities just in the cities of Tianjin, Chengdu, and Beijing, and the provinces of Hebei, Henan, and Shanxi (over 30 cities and provinces have thus far been targeted). Examples include the relocation of an AkzoNobel Chemical peroxides facility and Rhodia/Solvay synthetic sandalwood plant. Oftentimes, the closed facilities are already in industrial zones or on “chemical platforms,” which are nonetheless deemed unsuitable due to their proximity to residential areas (an estimated 10,000 areas originally zoned industrial have been reduced to fewer than 2,000). The closures and enforcement actions have resulted in widespread disruption of supply chains.
While the noted initiatives have thus far centered around energy generation and chemical/pharmaceutical facilities, their scope is poised to broaden, especially as, on March 17, 2018, the Ministry of Environmental Protection was reconstituted as the “Ministry of Ecology and Environment” (MEE) with expanded jurisdiction that now includes agriculture, livestock, marine pollution, and greenhouse gas generating sources. Li Ganje, Minister of MEE, has gone on record indicating that enforcement efforts will be expanded to these new sectors in the short term, including focus on non-point sources of water pollution.
The China enforcement and relocation programs have not been without immediate short term benefit: A recent study by the University of Chicago reports 35% and 29% reductions in air pollution for Beijing and Shijiazhuang, respectively. In the short term, businesses with current or contemplated operations (including joint ventures) in China need to carefully consider the impact of the new enforcement regime. Notably, assurance that China facilities comply with strict international environmental, safety, and health benchmarks is no longer a guarantee against disruption of operations.
This memorandum is a summary for general information and discussion only and may be considered an advertisement for certain purposes. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented, may not be relied upon as legal advice, and does not purport to represent the views of our clients or the Firm. Eric Rothenberg, an O'Melveny partner licensed to practice law in New York and Missouri, Walker J. Wallace, an O'Melveny partner licensed to practice law in New York, and John Rousakis, an O'Melveny counsel licensed to practice law in New York, contributed to the content of this newsletter. The views expressed in this newsletter are the views of the authors except as otherwise noted.
© 2018 O’Melveny & Myers LLP. All Rights Reserved. Portions of this communication may contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Please direct all inquiries regarding New York’s Rules of Professional Conduct to O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Times Square Tower, 7 Times Square, New York, NY, 10036, T: +1 212 326 2000.
Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.