alerts & publications
Trump Administration Takes Further Actions Targeting China as Term Nears EndDecember 21, 2020
The Trump administration announced two new actions targeting China, continuing an effort to cement its assertive national security policy toward China prior to the end of its term.
On December 17, 2020, the U.S. Secretary of Energy issued an order prohibiting utilities that supply critical defense facilities from procuring or installing certain bulk-power system electric equipment manufactured in or supplied from China. The Prohibition Order is a partial implementation of President Trump’s May 1, 2020, Executive Order on Securing the United States Bulk-Power System.
Then, on December 18, 2020, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) restricted the export of U.S. goods and technology to 77 mostly Chinese entities by adding them to the Entity List for actions deemed contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests. The added entities include the Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), China’s largest semiconductor manufacturer, and ten of its affiliates, as well as “entities in China that enable human rights abuses, entities that supported the militarization and unlawful maritime claims in the South China Sea, entities that acquired U.S.-origin items in support of the People’s Liberation Army’s programs, and entities and persons that engaged in the theft of U.S. trade secrets.”
Last week’s actions are consistent with the Trump administration’s effort to broadly target the ability of Chinese companies to access U.S. technology, while also taking steps to protect U.S. critical infrastructure and supply chains. See our prior alerts: United States Expands Export Controls Targeting Huawei’s Access to US Technology; President Trump Issues Executive Order Creating Telecommunications Assessment Committee; President Trump Issues Executive Order on Securing the United States Bulk-Power System.
These actions also follow President Trump’s post-election Executive Order prohibiting U.S. investments in companies with ties to the Chinese military. It is likely the administration will continue to take similar steps over the next month as President Trump attempts to cement his China policy before leaving office.
Bulk Power System Order
In May 2020, President Trump issued an Executive Order imposing national security-driven restrictions on the foreign supply of electric equipment for U.S. bulk-power systems and empowering the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with other government officials, to prohibit transactions initiated after May 1, 2020, related to any bulk-power system electric equipment involving a foreign adversary where the Secretary of Energy determines the transaction poses an undue risk of sabotage or subversion of the bulk-power system, catastrophic effects to U.S. critical infrastructure, or U.S. national security. The Executive Order required the Secretary of Energy to publish implementing regulations by September 28, but the regulatory process is ongoing and no rules have been published to date.
On December 17, in what appears to be an effort to partially implement the Executive Order prior to the end of the Trump Administration, Secretary of Energy Dan Brouillette issued a prohibition order “designed to reduce the risks that entities associated with the People’s Republic of China pose to the Nation’s bulk-power system (BPS).” Effective January 16, 2021, the order prohibits electric utilities that own or operate Defense Critical Electric Infrastructure (DCEI) that actively serves a Critical Defense Facility (CDF) (Responsible Utility) from acquiring, importing, transferring, or installing certain BPS electric equipment that (i) has been manufactured or supplied by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of the PRC, and (ii) is for use by the Responsible Utility as a component of its DCEI serving the CDF at a service voltage level of 69 thousand volts (kV) or higher, from the point of electrical interconnection (at a service voltage level of 69 kV of higher) with the CDF up to and including the next “upstream” transmission substation.
The BPS equipment within scope of the order is:
- Power transformers with low-side voltage rating of 69 thousand volts (kV) or higher and associated control and protection systems, like load tap changer, cooling system, and Sudden Pressure relay;
- Generator step up (GSU) transformers with high-side voltage rating of 69 kV or higher and associated control and protection systems like load tap changer, cooling system, and Sudden Pressure relay;
- Circuit breakers operating at 69 kV or higher;
- Reactive power equipment (Reactors and Capacitors) 69 kV or higher; and
- Associated software and firmware installed in any equipment or used in the operation of items listed in 1 through 4.
Entity List Designations
The Entity List is a list of persons—including businesses, research institutions, government and private organizations, and individuals—that are subject to licensing requirements for the export, re-export, and/or transfer (in-country) of certain items subject to U.S. jurisdiction. The Trump Administration, in particular, has used the Entity List as a tool to restrict access to U.S. technology, most notably in the case of Huawei.
On December 18, 2020, BIS added 77 entities to the Entity List, mostly but not exclusively from China, for actions contrary to U.S. foreign policy and national security. Chief among the added entities is SMIC, China’s largest semiconductor manufacturer, which was designated because of “evidence of activities between SMIC and entities of concern in the Chinese military industrial complex.” In a statement regarding SMIC’s designation, U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said, “We will not allow advanced U.S. technology to help build the military of an increasingly belligerent adversary. Between SMIC’s relationships of concern with the military industrial complex, China’s aggressive application of military civil fusion mandates and state-directed subsidies, SMIC perfectly illustrates the risks of China’s leverage of U.S. technology to support its military modernization,” and the “Entity List restrictions are a necessary measure to ensure that China, through its national champion SMIC, is not able to leverage U.S. technologies to enable indigenous advanced technology levels to support its destabilizing military activities.”
As a result of its addition to the Entity List, exports to SMIC and ten of its affiliates of all items, including goods, software, and technology, subject to U.S. jurisdiction will require a license. Items uniquely required for the production of semiconductors at ten nanometers or below will be subject to a presumption of denial policy; all other licenses will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
In addition to SMIC and its affiliates, the Entity List additions include: (1) Chinese entities that “have enabled wide-scale human rights abuses within China through abusive genetic collection and analysis or high-technology surveillance; (2) entities involved in China’s efforts to assert unlawful maritime claims in the South China Sea; (3) entities involved in efforts to acquire U.S.-origin items in support of programs for China’s People’s Liberation Army; and (4) entities involved in stealing U.S. trade secrets.”
The Trump administration’s actions require U.S. utility providers to take stock of the source of their bulk power equipment both to ensure compliance with the prohibition order, but also in anticipation of potential regulations imposing further restrictions on the use of equipment sourced from China and other adversarial countries (e.g., Russia). The addition of SMIC and the other Chinese entities to the Entity List makes it critical for companies transacting business in China, particularly U.S. businesses in the semiconductor industry, to have strong measures in place to ensure compliance with these expanding U.S. export controls.
Over the next month, the Trump administration may continue to initiate further actions targeting China prior to the end of its term, and it remains to be seen whether the incoming Biden administration will continue the Trump administration’s hardline approach to China or chart a new course.
This memorandum is a summary for general information and discussion only and may be considered an advertisement for certain purposes. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented, may not be relied upon as legal advice, and does not purport to represent the views of our clients or the Firm. Greta Lichtenbaum, an O'Melveny partner licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia, John Dermody, an O'Melveny counsel licensed to practice law in California and the District of Columbia, Mary Pat Dwyer, an O'Melveny counsel licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia and Pennsylvania, David J. Ribner, an O'Melveny counsel licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia and New York, and Paras Shah, an O'Melveny associate licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia and New York, contributed to the content of this newsletter. The views expressed in this newsletter are the views of the authors except as otherwise noted.
© 2020 O’Melveny & Myers LLP. All Rights Reserved. Portions of this communication may contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Please direct all inquiries regarding New York’s Rules of Professional Conduct to O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Times Square Tower, 7 Times Square, New York, NY, 10036, T: +1 212 326 2000.
Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.