Carlos M. Lazatin


Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.


Carlos Lazatin has extensive experience defending clients against class actions and mass tort litigation involving product liability and consumer fraud claims. Carlos represents companies in a variety of industries including food, apparel, automobile, and medical devices and products, through all levels of litigation. Prior to attending law school, Carlos worked in brand management at General Mills, Inc., giving him a deep understanding of how claims about false advertising and deceptive labeling affects his clients’ brands.

Carlos has briefed matters before the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, the Florida Supreme Court, the California Supreme Court, the California Court of Appeal, various U.S. District Courts, and the California Superior Court. Carlos has also argued matters before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and various state and federal trial courts. 



  • French
  • Spanish
  • Tagalog
  • German

Honors & Awards

  • Recognized by The Legal 500 in the “Product liability, mass tort and class action - automotive/transport” category (2017-2018)
  • Named a “Rising Star” in Consumer Protection law by Law360 (2014)
  • Recognized as a Southern California “Rising Star” by Super Lawyers and published in Los Angeles magazine (2013)


Bar Admissions

  • California

Court Admissions

  • US District Court, Northern, Central, and Southern Districts of California; Eastern District of Michigan; and District of Alaska
  • US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit


  • Harvard University, J.D.: cum laude; Winner, Best Brief, 91st Annual Ames Moot Court Competition
  • Princeton University, A.B., Public and International Affairs: magna cum laude; Phi Beta Kappa; Lt. John A. Larkin Memorial Prize for best thesis in the field of political economy; R.W. van de Velde Award for outstanding junior independent work

Professional Activities


  • Executive Committee of Litigation Section, Los Angeles County Bar Association
  • Board of Governors, Philippine American Bar Association
  • Defending a leading Korean automobile maker in a nationwide class action involving allegations that certain vehicles are defective due to the design and placement of the fuel tank. 
  • Defending one of the nation’s leading manufacturers of health care products in:
    • Multidistrict products liability litigation involving allegedly defective surgical sutures. Carlos drafted a successful opposition to certification of a nationwide class. 
    • Nationwide mass tort litigation involving claims that an over-the-counter pain reliever and fever reducer triggered the onset of a rare immunological disorder affecting the skin and mucosal membranes. 
    • Competitor and consumer class action lawsuits challenging the advertising and marketing of America’s leading brand of no-calorie sweeteners. 
  • Defending a leading manufacturer of plumbing products in class action litigation involving allegedly defective brass fixtures that were purportedly prone to failure. 
  • Representing a major manufacturer of athletic shoes in eight class actions across the United States alleging that the advertising for the company’s toning shoes deceptively claimed that the shoes provided certain fitness benefits, including increased muscle activation, increased calorie burn, improved posture, reduced pain in joints and muscles, improved circulation, improved muscle toning, and promoting weight loss and body fat reduction.