Andrew Frackman


Thank you for your interest. Before you communicate with one of our attorneys, please note: Any comments our attorneys share with you are general information and not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship will exist between you or your business and O’Melveny or any of its attorneys unless conflicts have been cleared, our management has given its approval, and an engagement letter has been signed. Meanwhile, you agree: we have no duty to advise you or provide you with legal assistance; you will not divulge any confidences or send any confidential or sensitive information to our attorneys (we are not in a position to keep it confidential and might be required to convey it to our clients); and, you may not use this contact to attempt to disqualify O’Melveny from representing other clients adverse to you or your business. By clicking "accept" you acknowledge receipt and agree to all of the terms of this paragraph and our Disclaimer.


Andrew Frackman is one of the firm’s most experienced trial lawyers, having tried, as lead or co-lead counsel, more than 20 cases or arbitrations through the close of evidence or arbitral award in state and federal courts and before numerous arbitral panels. His trial experience has involved such diverse disputes as antitrust, contract/commercial, intellectual property, insurance coverage, and federal tax claims. In the past 18 months, he has led trial teams for two week-long ICC arbitration hearings and a week-long bench trial in Delaware Chancery Court.

In addition to his courtroom experience, Andrew has handled and won numerous arbitrations before the following, among other, arbitration tribunals: American Arbitration Association - Commercial Rules; American Arbitration Association - ICDR Rules; International Chamber of Commerce; FINRA; New York Stock Exchange; NASDAQ; and ARIAS Reinsurance Panels. In addition, Andrew has extensive experience handling SEC investigations, including investigations involving alleged violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and municipal underwriting rules. The FCPA investigations have involved, among other things, alleged misconduct in Asia and the Middle East.

Andrew’s extensive antitrust experience includes defending some of the largest cases involving the financial services industries. He has represented Capital One Financial, Robertson Stephens, Banc of America Securities, Merrill Lynch, and The Goldman Sachs Group. He also has extensive experience in the airline industry, having represented several different airlines, including United Airlines, US Airways, and American Airlines, in antitrust litigation. And he was co-lead partner on the O’Melveny team that won a jury verdict in US Airways v. Sabre in the Southern District of New York in 2016. He has handled the full range of litigation involving federal securities law claims under Sections 10(b), 11, and 12, derivative actions under Delaware law, breach of fiduciary and related claims involving public and closely held corporations, as well as SEC investigations.


  • Russian

Honors & Awards

  • Recognized by Chambers USA in Litigation: General Commercial
  • Recommended by The Legal 500 US for General Commercial Disputes (2020), Antitrust Law (2016, 2018-2019), Cartel (2021), and Civil Litigation/Class Actions (2021)


Bar Admissions

  • New Jersey
  • New York

Court Admissions

  • US District Court, District of New Jersey, District of Colorado, Northern, Eastern and Southern Districts of New York
  • US Court of Appeals, Second, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits
  • US Tax Court
  • US Supreme Court


  • Columbia University, J.D., 1981: Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar (1979-81); Finalist, Harlan Fiske Stone Moot Court Competition (1980)
  • Harvard University, A.B., History, 1977: cum laude

Professional Activities


  • Chairman, New York Regional Board, Anti-Defamation League (2015-2017)
  • Anti-Defamation League, Legal Conference (N.Y. 2003)
  • New York State Bar Association "Federal Court Practice" Seminar, New York City (Spring 1995) 


  • New York State Bar Association, Antitrust Section, Executive Committee (2008-2013)
  • Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Committee on Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2002-2005), Committee on Federal Legislation (1987-90)
  • American Bar Association (Litigation and Antitrust Law Sections) 


  • Internet Privacy: A Legal and Business Guide (American Lawyer Media 2002)
  • “An Update From the Patent Wars,” The New York Law Journal (November 29, 2000) and The National Law Journal (December 25, 2000)
  • “Patent Law: E-Commerce Damages Awards,” The National Law Journal (July 3, 2000)
  • “Surf's Up: Wave of E-Commerce Patent Litigation Coming,” The New York Law Journal (April 17, 2000)
  • “Surfing the Wave of On-Line Privacy Litigation,” The New York Law Journal (March 14, 2000)
  • Cross-Examination in Law and Practice of Insurance Coverage Litigation (West 2000)
  • “Despite Supreme Court's 'Kodak' Ruling, Manufacturers Continue to Fend Off ISO's Claims of Sherman Act Violations in Aftermarkets for Parts and Service,” The National Law Journal (August 14, 1995)
  • ACTWU v. Wal-Mart: Is This the Cost of Corporate Democracy? Insights (August 1995)
  • “Shareholder Public Policy Proposals and the No-Action Letter Process,” 27 Rev. of Securities and Commodities Reg. 43 (March 9, 1994)
  • “Restricting a Former Employee's Use of Trade Secrets in New York,” New York State Bar Journal (December 1993) 


  • “The Capper-Volstead Act Exemption and Supply Restraints in Agricultural Antitrust Actions,” Competition: The Journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 69 et seq. (Fall 2010) (with Kenneth R. O’Rourke)
  • “Alien Concepts for the Chinese,” International Financial Law Review (May 2008) (with Bingna Guo)


  • Antitrust Expert Training Academy, New York State Bar Association (N.Y. October 2018)
  • IQPC Conference on Subprime and the Credit Crisis, “The Subprime Crisis: Emerging Litigation Trends” (N.Y. Feb. 2008)
  • West LegalWorks 17th, 16th, 15th, and 14th Annual Institute on Litigation and Resolution of Class Actions, "Recent Developments in Antitrust Class Actions” (N.Y. 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004)
  • Mealey’s Reinsurance 101 Conference “The Arbitration Process” (Boston, February 2004)
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers Intellectual Property Leadership Conference, “Your Business, Their Business and the Role of Business Method Patents” (Palm Desert, California, February 2001)
  • ABA Intellectual Property/Antitrust Roundtable, “Walker Process Claims after Nobelpharma” (May 1999)


  • AngioDynamics v. C.R. Bard, Case No. 1:17-cv-00598-BKS-CFH (N.D.N.Y.) Currently serving as lead counsel for C. R. Bard defending Sherman Act Section 1 tying claim by a competing provider of medical devices. Trial anticipated in late 2020.
  • US Airways, Inc. v. Sabre Holdings Corp., et al., Civ No. 1:11-cv-2725(MGC) (S.D.N.Y.). In 2016, successfully represented US Airways and American Airlines in an eight-week jury trial in the SDNY, obtaining jury verdict that the airline reservation system, Sabre, violated the antitrust laws. 
  • American Airlines, Inc. v. USA, Inc. et al., Case No. 13-22773-CV (Gayles) S. D. Fla. Represented American Airlines on antitrust counterclaims brought by online travel agent.
  • In re IPO Antitrust Litigation, decided by the Supreme Court sub nom. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. v. Billing, 551 U.S. 264 (2007). Represented Robertson Stephens and Banc of America Securities in this leading case on the implied immunity doctrine in which defendants successfully dismissed the action. 
  • In re Compensation of Managerial, Professional and Technical Employee Antitrust Litigation. Represented ExxonMobil and served as lead defense counsel defending claims that the defendant oil companies violated Sherman Act §1 to reduce pay of employees. Successfully defeated class certification twice and prevailed on summary judgment. 2006 WL 38937 (D.N.J. 1/5/06); 2006 WL 361383 (D.N.J. 2/15/06); 2008 WL 3887619 (D.N.J. 8/20/08) 
  • In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1720, E.D.N.Y.). Represented Capital One Financial in class action brought by merchants against Visa, MasterCard, and major payment card issuing banks alleging that the defendants conspired to set the fee that merchants pay for accepting payment cards.
  • American Express v. Visa, et al. (S.D.N.Y.). Represented Capital One Financial in action brought by American Express against the payment card networks and issuing banks alleging that they conspired to prevent American Express from competing in the network services market.
  • Ross v. Bank of America, et al. (S.D.N.Y. 05 CV 07116). Represented Capital One Financial in class action alleging that the largest payment card issuing banks conspired to impose arbitration agreements in their cardholder agreements.
  • In re Late Fee/Over-Limit Fee Class Actions. Represents Capital One Financial in putative class action brought by cardholders against credit card issuers alleging that they conspired to set late and over-limit fees. Defendants successfully dismissed the action. 528 F. Supp. 2d 953 (N.D. Cal. 2007).
  • FTC v. CCC Holdings Inc. and Mitchell International, Inc. (D.D.C. 08-2043(RMC)). One of lead trial lawyers for Mitchell in action in which FTC challenged proposed merger. 605 F. Supp. 2d 26 (D.D.C. 2009).
  • American Airlines v. United Airlines (S.D.N.Y.). One of lead lawyers representing United Airlines against claim that its merger with Air Wisconsin violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act.

Securities and Commercial Disputes

  • AM General Holdings, et al. v. The Renco Group, et al. (C.A. Nos. 7639 and 7668, Delaware Chancery Court 2019). Lead partner for Renco in Chancery Court trial arising from joint venture. Week-long bench trial in July 2019.
  • In re IPO Securities Litigation, 471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir. 2006). Represented Robertson Stephens and Banc of America Securities in the largest group of securities class actions ever brought, in which defendants defeated class certification in 310 coordinated market manipulation and Section 11 actions.
  • In re Short Selling Cases. Successfully represented Banc of America Securities and Merrill Lynch in seven securities and antitrust cases in New York, California, Washington, and Georgia alleging misconduct by prime brokers relating to short selling. Still pending: Overstock v. Morgan Stanley, et al. CGC-07-460147 (Ca. Super. Ct. County of San Francisco); Raser Technologies, Inc. et al. v. Morgan Stanley et al., 2012 CV 214140 (Ga. Super. Ct. Fulton Co.), and Manning v. Merrill Lynch et al., L-1173-12 (N.J. Super. Ct. Morris Co.)
  • Simmonds v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. Successfully represented Banc of America Securities, Merrill Lynch, and Robertson Stephens in numerous Section 16(b) actions coordinated under this caption in the W.D. Wash. Credit Suisse v. Simmonds, 132 S. Ct. 1414 (2012).
  • Aveta v. Bengoa (Del. Ch. Ct.). Successfully represented Aveta in shareholder dispute, winning key ruling on binding role of shareholders' representative, Aveta v. Cavallieri, 23 A.2d 157 (Del. Ch. 2010), and obtaining $750,000 contempt award, Aveta v. Bengoa, 986 A.2d 1166 (Del. Ch. 2009) and 2010 WL 3221823 (Del. Ch. 2010).
  • DeMarco v. Robertson Stephens, 318 F. Supp.2d 110 (S.D.N.Y. 2004); Podany v. Robertson Stephens, and Finazzo v. Robertson Stephens, 318 F. Supp.2d 146 (S.D.N.Y. 2004); 2004 WL 1161247 (S.D.N.Y. 5/24/2004). Represented Robertson Stephens in successfully dismissing two and resolving the third of these Section 10(b) actions alleging misstatements in analyst reports.
  • In re Crompton Corp. Securities Litigation (3:03-CV-1293) (D. Conn.). Represented Crompton/Chemtura in 10b-5 shareholder class action and the related shareholder derivative action.


  • Argued appeals in the US Court of Appeals for the Second and Third Circuits, the New York Court of Appeals, the New York Appellate Division, First and Second Departments, the US Board of Immigration Appeals, and the Massachusetts Appeals Court.

Alerts and Publications

Prompted by Sweeping Executive Order on Competition, New Leadership at US Antitrust Agencies to Launch Review of Merger Guidelines; Similar Initiatives in Europe and China May Signal Greater Convergence in Enforcement Across Jurisdictions

July 26, 2021

Unanimous Supreme Court Affirms Injunction Barring NCAA Rules that Limit Education-Related Compensation to Student Athletes

June 30, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That FTC Cannot Sue for Monetary Relief: AMG Capital Management v. FTC

April 26, 2021

European Commission Extends Reach Over Non-Reportable Transactions

April 6, 2021

Senator Klobuchar Unveils Broad New Proposed Antitrust Legislation

February 8, 2021

FTC Adjusts New 2021 HSR Reporting Thresholds Downward

February 3, 2021

EU Commission Publishes Text of EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment

January 27, 2021

The Department of Justice Antitrust Division Brings First-Ever Criminal No-Poach Case

January 22, 2021

Germany Strengthens Antitrust Enforcement Powers to Rein in Big Tech

January 19, 2021

China Expands National Security Review of Foreign Investments

January 12, 2021

European Commission Plan to Reform Europe’s Digital Space - Part 2 - Draft Digital Services Act

December 23, 2020

European Commission Plan to Reform Europe’s Digital Space - Part 1 - Draft Digital Markets Act

December 21, 2020

The Department of Justice Antitrust Division Brings First-Ever Criminal Labor Market Collusion Case

December 17, 2020

New Guidelines Clarify When Antitrust Division Will Consider Using Arbitration

December 1, 2020

The UK National Security and Investment Bill: Strengthening scrutiny of investment in the UK and introducing the UK’s first mandatory notification regime

November 20, 2020

China Publishes “Unreliable Entities” Rules Targeting Foreign Enterprises

September 22, 2020

DOJ Issues Letter Encouraging IEEE to Change Policy on Standard Essential Patents

September 18, 2020

Hong Kong Competition Tribunal Approves First Cartel Settlement

August 13, 2020

Congress Reauthorizes ACPERA and Repeals Sunset Provision

July 17, 2020

DOJ’s Prosecution of Generic Drug Companies Continues as it Announces Price-Fixing Charges Against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

July 2, 2020

The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority Targets Big Tech

July 2, 2020

DOJ and FTC Issue New Vertical Merger Guidelines

July 1, 2020

Germany’s Federal Cartel Office Calls for the EU Court of Justice’s Guidance on Important Patent Licensing Issues

June 25, 2020

Germany’s Supreme Court Sides with National Antitrust Enforcer in Facebook Abuse of Dominance Case

June 23, 2020

May Price Gouging Update

June 4, 2020

Updates on Recent US Merger Control Developments - May 2020

May 22, 2020

New Proposed Legislation in California Increases Antitrust Scrutiny in M&A and Other Activities in the Healthcare Industry

May 19, 2020

COVID-19 Antitrust M&A Considerations

May 7, 2020

Collusion in the Healthcare Industry: DOJ Charges Oncology Group for its Participation in a Criminal Antitrust Conspiracy

May 6, 2020

Price Gouging Update—April 2020

April 30, 2020

Gun-Jumping Concerns for Pending Transactions When There Is No Such Thing as “Ordinary Course of Business”

April 27, 2020

The Failing Firm Merger Defense in Times of Economic Turmoil: Past Lessons and the COVID-19 Crisis

April 23, 2020

Antitrust Agencies Watch for Labor Market Collusion in the Healthcare Industry

April 20, 2020

DOJ and FTC on Alert for Anticompetitive Conduct in Labor Markets for COVID-19 Essential Workers

April 15, 2020

Nationwide Shortages Open New Frontiers in Fight Against COVID-19-Related Price Gouging

April 14, 2020

Hong Kong Competition Commission Consults on Proposed Commitments Offered by Online Travel Agents to Remove Parity Clauses from Agreements with Accommodation Providers

April 9, 2020

China Adopts Antitrust Enforcement Policy to Fight COVID-19 and Spur Economic Recovery

April 8, 2020

Antitrust Implications of the President’s Invocation of the Defense Production Act

April 2, 2020

Department of Health and Human Services Triggers Price Gouging and Hoarding Provisions of Defense Production Act

April 1, 2020

Hong Kong Competition Commission Issues Statement on the Application of the Competition Rules to Cooperation Agreements Between Companies Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic

March 30, 2020

Competitor Collaborations and Communications in Time of Crisis: Practical Guidance

March 26, 2020

Antitrust Agencies Provide Guidance for Competitor Collaborations in Healthcare Sector as COVID-19 Outbreak Deepens

March 25, 2020

European Antitrust in the Time of COVID-19

March 25, 2020